|
GCIC专家智库 | Giulio M. Gallarotti 教授GCIC专家帮助具有前瞻性的决策者和组织(城市、公共机构、公司、教育实体和非政府组织)更深入地了解动态气候挑战，并为他们提供促进解决方案的工具和见解。通过研究、对话、咨询和创业。 我们专注的领域包括：气候、脱碳、能源、资源、循环经济、可持续商业、绿色金融以及城市和区域转型。 Giulio M. Gallarotti GCIC 专家入驻 卫斯理安大学政府学终身教授 哥伦比亚大学政治学联席教授 研究方向： 国际关系、非裔美国人，外交关系，全球，帝国史，思想史，政治史、奴隶制度 学术介绍: 该教授是卫斯理大学政府学教授，哥伦比亚大学政治学联席教授。他也是罗马大学经济理论系的客座教授 （1994）。他还在经济学、政治学、法学、历史学和商学五个学科的主要期刊上发表了大量文章。 Professor of Government at Wesleyan University Adjunct Professor of Political Science at Columbia University Research Interests: International Relations, African American, Foreign Relations, Global, Imperial History, Intellectual History, Political History, Slavery Academic introduction: Giulio M. Gallarotti is Professor of Government at Wesleyan University and Adjunct Professor of Political Science at Columbia University. He has also been a Visiting Professor in the Department of Economic Theory at the University of Rome (1994). He has published numerous articles in leading journals across five disciplines: economics, politics, law, history, and business. Giulio Gallarotti的企业环保主义理念 Giulio Gallarotti教授曾在哥伦比亚世界商业杂志发表题为“绿色环保为上策：管理激励结构和环保战略”的文章，讨论了环保主义企业是如何做到真正盈利的。 在管理学界，一般认为环境与企业之间，污染环境，企业就能获利，而防治污染却并不划算。尽管最近关于绿色管理有益的文献层出不穷，但许多管理人员仍然认为环保战略不利于实现盈利、维持市场、控制成本和高效生产等主要目标。Giulio Gallarotti教授认为这种关于环境拖累企业的结论是基于人们错误地假设了对企业的激励措施。发达国家政府对环境的更严格监管使其发生了改变。单就环保战略来说，尽管大众反对的舆论压力不减，但那些企业也有许多机会从中获益。这两种激励措施共同改变了关于良好企业与环境之间不相容的传统观念。如此看来，更值得做的其实是去防治污染，而非污染的道理便不言而喻了。 Concept of corporate environmentalism Professor Giulio Gallarotti has published an article entitled “It Pays to Be Green: The Managerial Incentive Structure and Environmentally Sound Strategies” in the Columbia Journal of World Business, about how corporate environmentalism could actually be quite profitable. The traditional view in management circles about the relationship between the environment and business can best be summed up as pollution pays, pollution prevention doesn't. Notwithstanding the recent proliferation of literature on the benefits of green management, many managers continue to see environmentally sound strategies as detrimental to the principal goals of profitability, maintaining markets, controlling costs and efficient production. Such conclusions about the environmental drag on business are based on mistaken assumptions about the incentives businesses encounter. Stricter government regulation of the environment in developed nations changed the equation. There are also many opportunities for managers to profit from environmentally sound strategies that are independent of public pressures. Together, these two types of incentives serve to turn the traditional vision about the incompatibility between good business and the environment on its head: it is becoming increasingly apparent that, indeed, pollution prevention pays while pollution doesn't. |
